The Energy Regulatory Commission has announced revised rules governing how power distribution utilities recover local taxes from consumers, tightening transparency requirements and adding safeguards against overcharging.

In Resolution No. 09, Series of 2026, issued March 31, the Commission set clearer guidelines on the recovery of real property tax, local franchise tax, and business tax, which are costs imposed by local government units but ultimately passed on to electricity users.

The updated framework requires distribution utilities (DUs) to submit complete supporting documents and regular reports before and during implementation, with all charges subject to post-validation by the ERC. Only taxes that are actually paid and properly documented may be passed on to consumers, and only within a defined recovery period.

To improve billing transparency, utilities must now reflect these charges as separate line items—RPT, LFT, and BT—in electricity bills, allowing consumers to better track what they are paying for.

The rules also mandate refunds for any over-collections, while under-recoveries may be carried over to future billing cycles, subject to regulatory approval.

“These revised rules ensure that consumers are charged only for taxes that are valid, reasonable, and properly verified. By requiring transparency and strict monitoring, we are empowering consumers to better understand their electricity bills while ensuring that distribution utilities remain financially viable,” ERC Chairperson Francis Saturnino C. Juan said.

The resolution also sets stricter conditions on the recovery of past tax liabilities. Arrears—excluding penalties and interest—may only be passed on under specific conditions, and in the case of electric cooperatives, will require consent from member-consumers.

The ERC said the revised rules were shaped by consultations with utilities, consumer groups, and industry associations, reflecting broader efforts to balance cost recovery for power firms with stronger consumer protection.

For Philippine energy sector stakeholders, the move signals tighter regulatory oversight on pass-through charges—an area long criticized for limited transparency—while reinforcing accountability mechanisms that could affect utility cash flows and rate-setting practices.

What do you think—will stricter validation and itemized billing meaningfully improve trust in electricity rates, or could it complicate cost recovery for utilities? 

Follow Power Philippines on Facebook and LinkedIn or join our Viber community for more updates.